Opening Statement



Thursday, 27 March 2014

OSSTF Bill 115 Legal Challenge?

 My Teacher + Union Acronym Guide is Here!



The following March 19 2014 letter explains why OSSTF has agreed to the government Attorney General's request that the June 2014 Bill 115 court hearing be adjourned. We earlier examined ETFO's member letter on their decision to also agree, with an open forum teacher free speech discussion on the pros and cons of the issues at stake Here!

The OSSTF letter emphasizes that the hearing will possibly re adjourn sometime in April 2015, about a year from now. The actual date is unknown, but it certainly doesn't seem like it will be any earlier then that. The union is prepared to step back upon advice of their lawyers to let other similar cases take precedence. There is also a referral to UNIFOR now wishing to intervene in the case.



The Bill 115 Constitutional Court Challenge was evoked by the OSSTF, ETFO, CUPE + OPSEU teacher and educational worker unions to frame their contract dispute with the Ontario Ministry of Education [MOE] during the tumultuous course of their 2013 to 2014 contract negotiations. In both the member and public eye, these were portrayed as a struggle for democratic rights rather than as just a self serving fight against the Bill 115 anti strike legislation. Under government pressure the public service sector unions then later agreed to accept controversial contract concessions or the "stripping" of key contract terms effecting their salary and benefit gains over the years through the collective bargaining process. The resulting contracts will expire on August 31 of this year. 

OSSTF like the ETFO members ratified their contract Memo's of Understanding [MOU's] last spring. CUPE and OPSEU had done so earlier. However it was not without a fair bit of dissatisfaction as was often expressed by the all affiliate reader comments on this site. Further exacerbating the situation was the OECTA Catholic teacher union's earlier contract agreement which became known as the MOU "roadmap". It was unilaterally ratified by the provincial executive without a member vote. OECTA then also decided not to get involved in the Bill 115 charter challenge. A lot of all affiliate member angst and feelings of discord and betrayal were expressed here on both counts. 


The following missive is included for your further teacher free speech "open forum" erudition, comment and discussion purposes as well educated, thinking union members. It was written as follows:
Two weeks ago, the judge assigned to the OSSTF/FEESO Bill 115 Charter challenge, Justice Himmel, held a meeting or case management conference of all the lawyers representing the unions (OSSTF, ETFO, CUPE, OPSEU) involved in the case and the Attorney General lawyers representing the government. Last week, Justice Himmel issued a decision on the basis of the meeting.
During the case management conference, the Attorney-General requested an adjournment (postponement) of the June 2014 hearing dates set aside by the Ontario Court to hear the Bill 115 Charter challenge. The Attorney General's postponement request stemmed from two issues:
1. Three cases similar in nature to OSSTF/FEESO’s Bill 115 case are currently being argued before the Supreme Court of Canada. The Attorney General presented the argument that the law is currently changing on the meaning of the protections for collective bargaining and strike action under s. 2(d) of the Charter. The current cases before the Supreme Court will shape and form the law and will be very instructive to the Judge hearing OSSTF/FEESO’s Bill 115 challenge. They argued that on a practical basis, the Court dates in June 2014 will be wasted because all parties will have to return following the Supreme Court's decision to address the updated law;
2. Another union wishes to intervene in the Bill 115 Challenge. UNIFOR believes that it has a direct interest in the Charter Challenge because some of its members were affected by Bill 115. It has requested to join the proceeding and file materials, and wants some time to be able to do so.
We sought legal advice on the request to postpone the Bill 115 Charter Challenge. While not pleased with a postponement, the Provincial Executive accepted the advice recognizing that the Justice Himmel was likely to grant it because it made sense from a legal perspective. Justice Himmel granted the adjournment thus cancelling the hearing date initially scheduled for June 2014. While we were advised by Justice Himmel last week that the matter would be adjourned until March 2015, the actual date was contested due to the unavailability of some of the parties. As a result, we are still waiting for confirmation of the actual hearing date. We anticipate that it will
likely take place sometime during April 2015. Once the final date is confirmed, we will advise you.
Legal Advice

Legal Counsel was of the view that the postponement request would be granted by the Court. Counsel advised us that the postponement made sense because they are also awaiting the Supreme Court's decisions in the other cases. They wish to prepare their materials based on the legal framework established by the Supreme Court with respect to s. 2(d) and the law is not clear right now. All of the other union lawyers came to the same conclusion.
We do not know when the Supreme Court of Canada will release its ruling on the cases raising the s. 2(d) issues. These rulings sometimes take up to eight or nine months depending on the complexity of the issues. These cases are complex because they are defining under our Charter of Rights and Freedoms what protections unions and their members have to participate in free and fair collective bargaining and strike action without intrusive and oppressive government intervention.  Bringing a Charter case before the court is a challenging undertaking. OSSTF/ FEESO, in working with its other union partners, is committed to bringing the strongest case forward possible. While this delay is disappointing, we believe it will better assist us in defending the rights of our members.
[ OSSTF General Secretary Pierre Côté ]


COMMENTS: 

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Wynne government jump imposed a salary grid freeze on every teacher next year. Tell me how Wynne is any different from Dalton McLiar again?

Anonymous said...

Salary grid freeze? Explain please.

Anonymous said...

ETFO sent a message late yesterday that the Wynne Government takes the position that the delay (97th day of the school year) in being granted experience credits and qualification improvements will continue next year and indefinitely if it is not "negotiated" out of existence...bargaining has been pre-empted once again and the federations will spend whatever energy they can muster to get us back to status quo on this issue and you can bet the government will demand a further concession!

Post a Comment

Communist Girls ARE More Fun!

Communist Girls ARE More Fun!
See below ...

Youtube Bar: Afrika Bambaataa!

Loading...

Communist Girls Are More Fun #1

Communist Girls Are More Fun #1

Communist Grrrls are More Fun #2

Communist Grrrls are More Fun #2

Communist Grrrls Are More Fun #3

Communist Grrrls Are More Fun #3

Communist Girls Are More Fun #4

Communist Girls Are More Fun #4

Art at the Paris Louvre: What does it mean?!?

Art at the Paris Louvre: What does it mean?!?
A careful analytical study!

Help! I Have No Arms!

Help! I Have No Arms!
Please scratch my back.

I can't find my underwear!.

I can't find my underwear!.
Have you seen them!

Weee! I can fly!

Weee! I can fly!
Look! I can crawl thru walls!

I have a headache!

I have a headache!
And a broken nose.

I have a square hole in my bum!

I have a square hole in my bum!

Here try this, it's very good!

Here try this, it's very good!
No. You have a bird face.

I have an ugly baby!

I have an ugly baby!
No I'm not!

Let's save all our money + buy pants!

Let's save all our money + buy pants!
OK but I need a new hand too!

Oh no! I got something in my eye!

Oh no! I got something in my eye!

You don't look well.

You don't look well.
No. My head hurts +I have a sore chest.

Would you like a bun?

Would you like a bun?

Chichen-Itza: Lost Maya City of Ruins!

Chichen-Itza: Lost Maya City of Ruins!
The Temple of Kukulkan!

Gotta love it!

Gotta love it!
Truly amazing!

Under Reconstruction!

Under Reconstruction!

Temples + Snakes!

Temples + Snakes!

The Snake!

The Snake!
It runs the length of the ball field!